| Urhobo Historical Society |
Culled from:

Friday,
September 11, 2009
Cleaning
Up Nigerian Banks: Let's Do This Thing Properly
By
Dr. Dele Cole
I
WAS happy to read the esteemed Justice Bola Ajibola's
comments in The Guardian newspaper last week on the recent actions of
the Central
Bank of Nigeria and the subsequent moves by the EFCC to detain both the
executives of those banks that have been sacked and the debtors
currently
regarded as 'non-performing'. Justice Ajibola,
while
congratulating the Central Bank Governor for his courage, was keen to
express
the importance of due process and transparency in the process for those
that
have been accused.
The
basis for the CBN's actions was
that the accused executives have demonstrated a lack of transparency in
their
dealings and a lack of respect for the depositor's funds under their
supervision, in some cases, taking their institutions to the point of
insolvency. Allegations such as these are serious, and if they are
proven
beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law to be true, then the
protagonists
deserve everything that they get, but we must act in a way that
provides
legitimacy to the process.
It
seems the EFCC has been given a
mandate to detain and pass judgement on
the accused
before specific guilt is proven. The Attorney General himself has said
that he
will give the EFCC the authority to pursue criminal proceedings against
both
the bankers and their debtors, but the accused have already received a
'public'
trial on the pages of newspapers with no recourse to defend themselves.
The EFCC need to be restrained from knee jerk reactions, not encouraged
in the
way they have been. We have recently seen significant plaudits given to
the
EFCC for the amount of money they have recovered on behalf of the banks
since
this episode started, but what is N25 billion when compared to the N740
billion
or so non-performing loans that the CBN says it has identified, or the
N400
billion the CBN has injected into the system to prevent collapse?
Not
only is the amount collected so
far puny, compared to the total value of the non-performing loans
supposedly
identified, but we now have the spectre of
depositors
losing their money if what the NDIC has said is true. During the
previous CBN
Governor's tenure one of the main concerns was that he repeatedly said
that no
depositor would lose their money, which was patently untrue if you
consider
that fact that depositors in banks that did not meet the consolidation
requirements are still waiting to receive their money. Mr
Sanusi has maintained the same mantra,
verbally
reassuring depositors that their money is safe, when everything
suggests that
this is not true. If the money of depositors is safe then why does the
CBN not
guarantee deposits in the same way as governments in the U.S. and
Europe do? No
amount of sanitation within the banking sector will return confidence
without
such a guarantee.
Not
only do we have no guarantee on
deposits, but we have no clear proposals from government on dealing
with the
main causes of the financial crisis in Nigeria in the first place. The
reasons
for the extreme de-valuation of assets in the stock market alongside
the
ongoing issues in the downstream petroleum sector are not being
addressed. We
have no policy to guarantee deposits, no policy to return confidence to
the
capital market and no policy to restore confidence in the financial
services
sector.
The
CBN needs to very careful in the
way that it implements its current policies. Banks are the lifeblood of
our
economy and risk is an inherent part of their operations.
It is vital that while ensuring increased transparency and disclosure
in the system, the CBN does not stifle the credit vital to the
successful
operations of our economic system. Oceanic Bank, Intercontinental Bank
and
Union Bank took immense entrepreneurial spirit to establish, we cannot
allow
ourselves to destroy the entrepreneurial spirit that is the bedrock of
development. We will end up with a tepid, diluted and incapacitated
financial
system sacrificed at the altar of egotism. We must protect the
infrastructure
that has been built as we institute better transparency and systems.
While
I am talking about
infrastructure, let's look at another fundamental issue in this story.
The
nature of our environment means that debtors to banks may have
legitimate
reasons for failure to repay obligations on time. They may not have
been paid
by the government on time (downstream oil & gas),
their goods may have been delayed due to port congestion or corrupt
customs
officials. Perhaps there is no electricity supply to their factory?
What
authority will resolve the fundamental issues that are required to
create a
viable economic environment for business to thrive? The CBN should not
implement policy in isolation; the issues are much wider than financial
services.
It
seems that in Nigeria, the only
time the government functions effectively is when it acts in a
paramilitary
way, rather than one that follows due process and secures the
legitimacy of the
outcome. The CBN has quite dramatically washed its dirty laundry in
public; we
can only hope that the detergent they have used will not irreversibly
damage
the clothes they are washing.
There
is another worrying element to
this process that must be mentioned. Why are we in such a hurry to sell
these
five institutions? Only 10 of the 24 audits have been completed so far
and we
do not have a holistic view of the situation that would allow a sales
strategy
to be developed that addresses all of the issues. Let's take an example
from
the international community over the last two years. Lloyd's
acquisition of
HBOS during the height of the credit crunch was initially billed as
great business, only for reality to emerge
much later on with
Lloyds forced to accept considerable sums of government money to cover
undiscovered liabilities in HBOS that were not spotted because of the
speed of
the sale process. Do we want to replicate this error?
The
law allows the CBN governor to
proceed with these sales, but civil society should be pursuing an
injunction
against the sale to ensure that the process is conducted properly and
at the
appropriate time. Perhaps Mr. Sanusi is
not confident
in the calibre of the appointments he has
made to
take over the troubled banks? Certainly many of them have had less than
illustrious banking careers and are of questionable pedigree. Are they
the
right people to return these banks to stability?
There
are too many questions to be
answered in this process at the moment. There is the perception of a
political
motive lurking in the background, and the perception that sectional
interests
are behind the move must be avoided. Issues that have not been fully
explained
and demonstrated to be fair should be treated carefully and I fear we
are
seeing the 'bull in a china shop' approach so common to our history. We
look
like a banana republic at the moment, when the process that is being
pursued
should in fact ensure an improvement in the reputation of our nation
and its
financial services sector. I urge all involved to resist the urge to
pursue
vendetta's, to avoid the sensational in favour
of the
practical and to work to ensure that those that are guilty are
punished, but
those that are innocent are not tainted by over-exuberance on behalf of
the
authorities. It would be interesting to know if the CBN would stand up
to the
level of scrutiny it is currently applying to the banks.